Should Code Review Include Manual Testing? Depends!
Should code review include manual testing? Yes! No! Maybe! Opinions are divided. What's yours?
Should code review include manual testing? Yes! No! Maybe! Opinions are divided. What's yours?
I want to write automated tests. That's what a good developer does and dammit I'm a good developer. But how? And why is it so difficult to get started?
We have an ongoing debate in my team concerning what exactly a code review covers, and I am once again asking for my readers' help in deciding whether I am crazy or not. Here's the setup: we are a five-person development team, responsible for 2 major projects and 15 minor
1. It doesn't get easier; you get smarter. Programming is not a simple endeavor. Requirements change in the middle of projects; technology advances quickly and ruthlessly; customers are quick to judge and slow to explain. Programming does not get easier. Rather, we programmers get smarter. Sponsored by #native_company# #native_
I recently had a problem in which I could not add a new project to an existing solution which was bound to TFS source control. The only option I would get when I right-clicked on the new project was Source Control -> Add Solution to Source Control, which looked something